Friday, September 25, 2020

For men and boys the future looks bleak

The following article originally appeared in the always entertaining Gwen’s Place, Glavyril's now-defunct blog. Although originally written with tongue in cheek, as time goes by, the grains of truth buried in this article may come to fruition.


Personally I am in the camp that believes that “male” and “female” are precise terms defined by the biological capacity of each sexes anatomy. We can change anatomy, but we can’t change capacity, yet… perhaps more on that later. So, from my perspective, all other gender roles, duties, activities, etc. are anchored in societal constructions and subject to change.

What we have is an assessment of the social future for males if current trends continue. What trends you ask?

First and foremost, despite the feminist smoke screen, women are obtaining more education, better jobs, and higher pay then men. Women have the same sexual and financial freedom that only men really enjoyed in the past. That is to their credit. Boys don’t seem to get it, evidently all planning careers in the NFL, MLB, NBA, etc. ?

One reads almost constantly now about the woman as the predominate bread winner in the modern marriage and the stresses it causes for men and let’s face it, in modern society hunting skills are not exactly appreciated and day labor isn’t the avenue to financial freedom. The tipping point will come, not sure when, perhaps when women run almost everything including the government and boys have fallen so far behind that attracting, marrying and pleasing a successful woman is their only chance of financial security? At the very least, the time of male physical violence and sexual aggression against females will be over. In the more extreme case, my Holiday picture there may not be far off!

The standard of  “male” attractiveness will be set by society, which is now a reflection of female power. If they decide that all males should be muscle-bound hunks well, that does fly in the face of my construct, but I think not as it enhances the innate physical advantage that already exists. No, I think women would likely apply the same principals to men that were applied to them, likely and ironically through the educational system.

Females will opt for the prettiest, softest boys, who can still satisfy their female needs, but in a gentle and attentive way. It will be boys who compete on the fashion and social stage for the attention of the girls. Rough whiskers will be a definite no-no and treatments that eliminate it quickly and painlessly will make millions. Boys will depilitate and wear heels to make their hairless legs look shapelier and be brought to tears if a girl calls one “rough.” No need to deal with tough courses in math and science, everyone will agree boys just aren’t suited for such learning. 

Oh, not to worry, society will still have it’s,  “Girls,” “Ladies,” “Brides” and “Wives,” they will just be male. The term “Mother” will not be banned as some futurist extremists predicted, it will just no  longer have anything to do with the birth-giver but refer to the person raising the children. While the female gestates the baby, the future “Mother” will drink his daily “nursing cocktail” – a hormonal bomb that will certainly temporarily highly feminize and render his breasts perfectly capable of lactating and nursing. (That could probably be done now, who knows?)

So, when you go to visit your grandson and his “Husband” for the Holidays and you see the scene above, don’t say I didn’t warn you!




Wearing Baum Und Pferdgarten
Wearing Baum Und Pferdgarten




Two Girls – One Male and One Female
Two Girls – One Male and One Female

11 comments:

  1. I think the future for women is bleak. The worlds population is already way too big and soon a voluntary, followed by a forced, sterilization of women will take place. Female children will be less desirable and the need to get a partner to raise offspring will be much less necessary. If the population explosion in not slowed down now, the world is doomed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. An interesting slant. I can't say I disagree. Over population will kill the planet. If it evolves into chaos, then testosterone will rule. If saner heads prevail, it will most likely be estrogen in charge.
      My $0.02
      Angel Amore

      Delete
    2. HEY!
      ANYBODY SEEN THE MOVIE 'SOYLENT GREEN' LATELY?
      VELMA

      Delete
  2. The "hard, basic, bigoted man world" is dying.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Those femulator/female photos can be stunning. And there are many members of our community who seem to have been meant to be (or present as) women. Then there are femulators like me who will always be "the man in a dress". The femulator in this photo is amazing, gorgeous and slender. I think I was her weight many years ago -- but only for about 15-20 minutes. Mikki has her fantasy dreams, but this "man in a dress" is only made whole by being able to be be "Mikki" as I choose.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who is the femulator in the photo? The brunette or the blonde?

      Delete
  4. hopeing for he day , Tell us more

    ReplyDelete
  5. i totally agree with the view that (regardless of how deluded feminists may try and convince you otherwise) that contrary to what james brown sang it is indeed a womans world today. one where they can have their cake and eat it too - in so many different ways

    therefore it is hardly surprising that more and more biological males are deserting that particular sinking ship in favour of trying to clamber aboard the luxury liner "the fairer sex" - even if being offered a berth in steerage is the best they can hope for!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I loved visiting Gwen's Place - she had a wonderful sense of humor .I don't know if I enjoyed her photos and photo manipulations , or her stories, more .

    Sadly , I understand that Gwen passed away a year or so ago . The world is a poorer place without her , for sure .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the update. I wondered what happened to Gwen.

      Delete