There is a little irony in the hosiery drawer: many women were delighted to stop wearing pantyhose, while plenty of crossdressers are delighted to put them on.
What explains the difference? How can the same garment be an unwelcome nuisance to one person and the finishing touch to another?
Perhaps it depends on what putting it on means.
For generations, hosiery was part of the price of being properly dressed as a woman. A skirt or dress called for stockings or pantyhose. Bare legs could look unfinished—or so the rules went.
Then the rules loosened. Trousers became everyday wear, offices became more casual, and bare legs became acceptable. Women could finally decide whether hosiery was worth the trouble.
And there is trouble. Pantyhose can be hot. Waistbands can pinch. The crotch can head south while the waistband stays put. A perfectly good pair can become a perfectly useless pair after one encounter with a fingernail.
If you wore them every working day, the opportunity to leave them in the drawer probably felt like progress.
But consider the crossdresser who spent years wishing she could wear them.
For her, hosiery may carry none of those associations with office requirements or compulsory grooming. Instead, it may represent something long admired and, perhaps, long forbidden. Putting on a pair can be one more step toward seeing the woman she wants to present in the mirror.
The obligation and the opportunity are very different experiences.
There is also the matter of when our ideas about femininity took shape. Many of us grew up admiring women whose outfits included dresses, heels, and sheer hosiery. Those images made an impression. Fashion may have moved on, but our affection for that look did not necessarily move with it.
A skirt, pumps, and nylon-clad legs can still say “beautifully dressed” to someone who first learned that visual language decades ago.
Hosiery also does a useful job. It can soften uneven skin tone and give legs a smoother appearance. With the right shade and sheerness, it can pull an outfit together without drawing much attention to itself.
And some people simply like the feel of it. There need not be a complicated explanation for every preference. Some women love hosiery, some crossdressers dislike it, and some of us are quite willing to risk a run for the pleasure of wearing a favorite pair.
We should also be careful about the comparison we are making. A crossdresser’s photograph may show an outfit selected for a much-anticipated evening out. The woman beside us in the supermarket may be squeezing in errands after a long day. One has dressed for an occasion; the other has dressed to get things done.
Of course their choices may differ.
None of this makes pantyhose a requirement for femininity. A woman in bare legs is fully dressed, and a crossdresser need not wear hosiery to complete some imaginary checklist. The best reason to wear it is that you like how it looks and feels.
Still, I appreciate the irony.
For some women, freedom meant no longer having to wear pantyhose.
For some crossdressers, freedom meant finally being able to.
And somewhere between those two experiences is a department-store hosiery counter—and someone hoping her favorite shade has not been discontinued.
![]() |
| Wearing ShopBop |
![]() |
| John Hunter, Australian female impersonator, circa 1952 |
















